Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

6 F.R.D. 609, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1639
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 29, 1946
DocketCivil Action No. 5989
StatusPublished

This text of 6 F.R.D. 609 (Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 6 F.R.D. 609, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1639 (W.D. Pa. 1946).

Opinion

GIBSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff has served upon defendant seventeen interrogatories, citing as authority therefor Rule No. 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.GA. following section 723c.

The defendant has objected to Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 17. Certain of the interrogatories to which objection is made demand information as to possible reports made to defendant relative to the accident mentioned in the complaint and call upon defendant to state the nature of the reports, the names of the persons who took them, and for a copy of the report. Several others pray for copies of maps or plans and photographs of the locality of the accident prepared or taken for defendant.

The plaintiff is entitled to discovery in respect to the subject matter of the interrogatories, with two possible exceptions, however. If the reports were made personally to counsel of the defendant, upon his examination, for his use at the trial, such reports are privileged, and the defendant is not required to answer the interrogatories respecting such reports. The plaintiff is entitled to discovery of the plans and photographs, but inspection of them under Rule 34 is the logical method rather than the requirement that defendant prepare copies of them.

As a matter of convenience the defendant may desire to submit the matters requested, in view of the offer of plaintiff to bear the expense of their preparation.

The objections of defendant to Interrogatories Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12,14, 16 and 17 are overruled except as they are sustained in the foregoing memorandum, now referred to and made part hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F.R.D. 609, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-title-trust-co-v-pennsylvania-r-co-pawd-1946.