Potter Real Estate Co. v. O & S Bearing & Mfg. Co.

32 A.D.2d 883, 302 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3585
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1969·No. No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The court should not have considered the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction until the plaintiff was permitted disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [d]). The plaintiff was entitled to the opportunity to show that defendant was transacting business in Hew York State and, therefore, subject to jurisdiction under CPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 1). (Agrashell, Inc. v. Sirotta Co., 344 F. 2d 583; Crossley Glove Co. v. Wakefield Leathers, 30 A D 2d 598; Lohne v. City of New York, 25 A D 2d [884]*884440.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term dismissing complaint in action for commission.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter Real Estate Co. v. O & S Bearing & Mfg. Co., 32 A.D.2d 883, 302 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 883 (Potter Real Estate Co. v. O & S Bearing & Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carney v. S. E. Nichols, Inc.
87 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)