Potowick v. Commonwealth
This text of 250 S.W. 102 (Potowick v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
Reversing.
Appellant was indicted in the Pike circuit court and tried on the charge of unlawfully manufacturing spirituous liquors.
The essential facts in this case are the same as in the case of Duncan v. 'Commonwealth, from Payette county, this day decided. The only difference is that the officer in this case was a federal prohibition enforcement officer, while in the Duncan case he was the sheriff
The search in this case was made in the absence of the defendant and with consent or acquiescence of appellant’s wife. ' The lower court admitted the evidence, as did the court in the Duncan case, over the objection of defendant.
[844]*844Upon the authority of the Duncan case and the Amos case in the Supreme Court of the United States therein quoted, the judgment in this case is also reversed, with directions to grant appellant a new trial and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 S.W. 102, 198 Ky. 843, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potowick-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1923.