Potowick v. Commonwealth

250 S.W. 102, 198 Ky. 843, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 563
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 1, 1923·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner—

Reversing.

Appellant was indicted in the Pike circuit court and tried on the charge of unlawfully manufacturing spirituous liquors.

The essential facts in this case are the same as in the case of Duncan v. 'Commonwealth, from Payette county, this day decided. The only difference is that the officer in this case was a federal prohibition enforcement officer, while in the Duncan case he was the sheriff

The search in this case was made in the absence of the defendant and with consent or acquiescence of appellant’s wife. ' The lower court admitted the evidence, as did the court in the Duncan case, over the objection of defendant.

[844]*844Upon the authority of the Duncan case and the Amos case in the Supreme Court of the United States therein quoted, the judgment in this case is also reversed, with directions to grant appellant a new trial and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potowick v. Commonwealth, 250 S.W. 102, 198 Ky. 843, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 563 (Ky. Ct. App. 1923).

250 S.W. 102 (Potowick v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garr v. Commonwealth
463 S.W.2d 109 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1971)
Manning v. Commonwealth
328 S.W.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1959)
Hall v. Commonwealth
261 S.W.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1953)
The People v. Lind
18 N.E.2d 189 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1938)
Cass v. State
61 S.W.2d 500 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
State v. Bonolo
270 P. 1065 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1928)
Gilliland v. Commonwealth
6 S.W.2d 467 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Veal v. Commonwealth
251 S.W. 648 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)