POTOCHINK v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co.
379 Pa. 154
This text of 379 Pa. 154 (POTOCHINK v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
POTOCHINK v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co., 379 Pa. 154 (Pa. 1954).
Opinion
Potochnik
v.
Pittsburgh Railways Co., Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.
*155 Donald M. Bane, with him James A. Geltz, Leo Daniels and Prichard, Lawler & Geltz, for appellant.
P.J. McArdle, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, November 8, 1954:
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge ADAMS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Potochnik v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
108 A.2d 733 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
379 Pa. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potochink-v-pittsburgh-rwys-co-pa-1954.