Potier v. Potier

198 A.D.2d 180, 604 N.Y.S.2d 77
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1993·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered April 28, 1993, which denied defendant husband’s motion to enjoin plaintiff wife from relocating with the parties’ child from New York City to New Hope, Pennsylvania, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiffs relocation to New Hope where her new husband could be within commuting distance of his work in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, does not violate the parties’ separation agreement. New Hope is within 60 radial miles, although 77 road miles, of the Empire State Building. Moreover, although defendant’s midweek visitation has necessarily been diminished, the court has increased his visitation in other respects. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potier v. Potier, 198 A.D.2d 180, 604 N.Y.S.2d 77 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 180 (Potier v. Potier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnette v. Blair
57 A.D.3d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Hapeman v. Hapeman
229 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Wright v. Wright
211 A.D.2d 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)