Poteet v. State
This text of 17 S.W.2d 46 (Poteet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— The offense is selling intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinément in the penitentiary for one and one-half years, '
*467 The statement of facts does not appear to have been filed in the trial court. The state’s attorney moves to strike the statement of facts from the record. The motion must be sustained. This court will not consider a statement of facts which fails to show that it was filed in the trial court. White v. State, 5 S. W. (2d) 510.
The questions presented by appellant’s bills of exception cannot be reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 S.W.2d 46, 112 Tex. Crim. 466, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poteet-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.