Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/POTEATE v. Juliano

POTEATE v. Juliano

960 So. 2d 792, 2007 WL 1709637
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 2007
Docket5D07-22
StatusPublished

This text of 960 So. 2d 792 (POTEATE v. Juliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
POTEATE v. Juliano, 960 So. 2d 792, 2007 WL 1709637 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

960 So.2d 792 (2007)

Donald POTEATE, Appellant,
v.
Thomas JULIANO, et al., Appellee.

No. 5D07-22.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 15, 2007.
Rehearing Denied July 20, 2007.

*793 Christian A. Lindbaek, of Alpizar Ville, LLC, Palm Bay, for Appellant.

Helaine S. Goodner and Elaine I. Parris, of Fowler White Burnett P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Lucente v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 591 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding injured motorist could bring action against tort-feasor's liability insurer for failing to provide requested insurance information only after motorist obtained judgment against tort-feasor).

THOMPSON, PALMER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucente v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
591 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
960 So. 2d 792, 2007 WL 1709637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poteate-v-juliano-fladistctapp-2007.