Pote v. Pote
139 N.E. 469, 80 Ind. App. 699, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 197
This text of 139 N.E. 469 (Pote v. Pote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pote v. Pote, 139 N.E. 469, 80 Ind. App. 699, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 197 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed on authority of Holland v. Hummell (1909), 43 Ind. App. 358, point 1, page 360, 87 N. E. 662; McKinzie v. Fisher Gibson Co. (1915), 59 Ind. App. 14, point 2, page 15, 108 N. E. 867; Palmer v. Beall (1915), 60 Ind. App. 208, 110 N. E. 218.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Holland v. Hummell
87 N.E. 662 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)
McKinzie v. Fisher Gibson Co.
108 N.E. 867 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Palmer v. Beall
110 N.E. 218 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 N.E. 469, 80 Ind. App. 699, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pote-v-pote-indctapp-1923.