Potash v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Potash v. Scott

135 A. 924, 4 N.J. Misc. 1004, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 36

DecidedNovember 24, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 924 (Potash v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Potash v. Scott, 135 A. 924, 4 N.J. Misc. 1004, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 36 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application is for a-peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the building inspector of East Orange to issue a building permit to the relator, as owner of certain lands in that city. The facts are not substantially variant from the [1005]*1005situations presented in cases decided by this court and the Court of Errors and Appeals, like State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389, where the legal right of the relator to the relief asked was recognized.

Por the same reason a peremptory writ of mandamus will be ordered in this ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The application is for a-peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the building inspector of East Orange to issue a building permit to the relator, as owner of certain lands in that city. The facts are not substantially variant from the [1005]*1005situations presented in cases decided by this court and the Court of Errors and Appeals, like State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389, where the legal right of the relator to the relief asked was recognized.

Por the same reason a peremptory writ of mandamus will be ordered in this ease.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A. 924, 4 N.J. Misc. 1004, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potash-v-scott-nj-1926.