Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.

D.C. Circuit

Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.

297 F. 544, 54 App. D.C. 285, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1924

DocketNo. 1621

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 297 F. 544 (Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co., 297 F. 544, 54 App. D.C. 285, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850 (D.C. Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appellee secured registration of the , mark “Fig-Nuts” under the provisions of the Trade-Mark Act of March 19, 1920 (41 Stat. 533 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 9516a et seq.]), and in this proceeding, based upon section 2 of that act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 9516b), it is sought to cáncel the registration.

In U. S. Compression Inner Tube Co. v. Climax Rubber Co., 53 App. D. C. 370, 290 Fed. 345, we ruled that the act in question contains no provision for appeal to this court, and hence that we are without jurisdiction to consider one.

It results that this appeal must be and is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

Petition for appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States granted July 1, 1924.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI