Poston v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Poston v. State

399 S.E.2d 592, 303 S.C. 167, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 260

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 26, 1989

Docket23039

StatusPublished

This text of 399 S.E.2d 592 (Poston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poston v. State, 399 S.E.2d 592, 303 S.C. 167, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 260 (S.C. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Chandler, Justice:

State appeals the Circuit Court’s grant of post-conviction relief (PCR) to Respondent, Thomas Toland Poston (Poston).

Poston was convicted in 1976 of armed robbery and sentenced to 21 years. His trial counsel, after filing notice of intent to appeal, filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967). The appeal was reviewed by this Court and dismissed under Rule 23 of the Supreme Court Rules of Practice.

On September 30,1987, a PCR application was filed by Pos-ton. It was granted by the Circuit Court upon the ground that Poston’s appellate counsel had filed the Anders brief without Poston’s permission.

It is clear from a reading of Anders that the decision to file, or not file, a no-merit brief rests soley with appellate counsel. There is no authority to support the Circuit Court’s holding that Poston’s consent to the filing is required.

Moreover, this Court’s full review of Poston’s appeal, as provided for in Anders, accorded Poston his full constitutional and statutory rights.

Accordingly, we reverse the grant of PCR.

Reversed.

Gregory, C.J., and Harwell, Finney and Toal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI