Poston v. Rock Tenn Smurfit-Stone

607 F. App'x 342
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1601
StatusPublished

This text of 607 F. App'x 342 (Poston v. Rock Tenn Smurfit-Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poston v. Rock Tenn Smurfit-Stone, 607 F. App'x 342 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney F. Poston appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Rock Tenn Smurfit-Stone in Poston’s employment discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Poston’s informal [343]*343brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Poston has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument'because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
607 F. App'x 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poston-v-rock-tenn-smurfit-stone-ca4-2015.