Poston v. Fears
828 S.W.2d 845, 309 Ark. 413, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 319
Opinion
The plaintiff filed suit against three defendants. Two of the three defendants filed motions for judgments on the pleadings. See A.R.C.P. Rule 12(c). The trial court granted the motions for the two defendants, but the third separate defendant remains in the suit below. Thus, the trial court did not grant a final judgment, see A.R.C.P. Rule 54(b), and yet, the plaintiff seeks to appeal. We dismiss the appeal because the order entered is not an appealable order. Burnley v. Mutual of Omaha, 291 Ark. 185, 723 S.W.2d 363 (1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poston v. Fears, 828 S.W.2d 845, 309 Ark. 413, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 319 (Ark. 1992).
828 S.W.2d 845 (Poston v. Fears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burnley v. Mutual of Omaha
723 S.W.2d 363 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1987)