Poston v. Conrad

580 F. App'x 180
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7882
StatusPublished

This text of 580 F. App'x 180 (Poston v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poston v. Conrad, 580 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Allen Wayne Poston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court but modify the dismissal to be without prejudice to Po-ston’s right to refile if his conviction is invalidated or called into question by the appropriate court. Poston v. Conrad, No. 3:13-cv-00586-FDW, 2013 WL 5948111 (W.D.N.C, Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poston-v-conrad-ca4-2014.