Postma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Postma v. State

839 So. 2d 860, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3102, 2003 WL 1023177

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 2003

DocketNo. 2D01-3903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 839 So. 2d 860 (Postma v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Postma v. State, 839 So. 2d 860, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3102, 2003 WL 1023177 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

Jacquelyn Postma appeals her conviction and sentence for second-degree murder. We affirm her conviction without discussion, but we remand for the trial court to strike the language in Postma’s sentence indicating that she is ineligible for parole.

Upon Postma’s motion to correct sentencing error, the trial court entered an order striking the language from the written judgment and sentence that Postma was ineligible for parole. However, it appears from the record before us that such language was never stricken from the written judgment and sentence. We therefore remand this case for the trial court to strike such language from Postma’s sentence if it has not already done so.

Conviction and sentence affirmed; remanded for trial court to strike parole ineligibility language from sentence.

SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI