Posten v. . Henry

34 N.C. 339
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 5, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.C. 339 (Posten v. . Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Posten v. . Henry, 34 N.C. 339 (N.C. 1851).

Opinion

Pearson, J.

When this case was before us at August Term, 1850, it was decided against the plaintiff, upon the ground, that no connection had been shown between him and Jones. We think that objection is now fully met by the two deeds, which were read in evidence. By them Jones is made a privy in estate with the plaintiff; and this case is the ordinary one of a purchaser, who brings ejectment, on the demise of the bargainor, to obviate an objection, on account of an adverse possession at the execution of the deed.

The bargainee is a privy in estate, and has the right to use- the name of the bargainor to effect a recovery, and to take possession in his name.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed, and venire de novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 N.C. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posten-v-henry-nc-1851.