Postel v. Libero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Postel v. Libero

245 A.D.2d 360, 666 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 360 (Postel v. Libero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Postel v. Libero, 245 A.D.2d 360, 666 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered September 19, 1996, which, upon an order of the same court entered September 12, 1996, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, who crashed his vehicle into the rear of the decedent’s vehicle, failed to show the existence of an issue of fact as to whether the defendant’s decedent was negligent. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the action (see generally, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361; cf., Kelly v Ventura, 243 AD2d 446). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered September 19, 1996, which, upon an order of the same court entered September 12, 1996, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, who crashed his vehicle into the rear of the decedent’s vehicle, failed to show the existence of an issue of fact as to whether the defendant’s decedent was negligent. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the action (see generally, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361; cf., Kelly v Ventura, 243 AD2d 446). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 360, 666 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postel-v-libero-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack