Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Peyton

52 S.E. 803, 124 Ga. 746, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 602
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 13, 1906·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

EvaNS, J.

(After stating the facts.) A jury can not be left to roam without any evidence in the ascertainment and assessment of damages. The damages which the law allows to be assessed in favor of a landowner whose property has been taken or damaged under the right of eminent domain are purely compensatory. Thé land actually appropriated by the telegraph company amounted to only a. fraction of an acre; and while it appeared- that the construction and maintenance of the telegraph line would cause consequential damages to the plaintiff, no proof was offered from, which any fair and reasonable estimate of the amount of damages thereby sustained could be made. The jury should have been supplied with the data necessary in arriving at such an estimate. Swift v. Broyles, 115 Ga. 887. Tn the absence of this essential proof, a verdict many times in excess of the highest proved value of the land actually taken must necessarily be deemed excessive.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Peyton, 52 S.E. 803, 124 Ga. 746, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 602 (Ga. 1906).

52 S.E. 803 (Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Peyton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Municipal Electric Authority v. Anglin
349 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Housing Authority v. Spink
85 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Georgia Power Co. v. Brooks
62 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Kelly
1936 OK 427 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Fitch v. State Highway Commission
21 P.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1933)