Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Dickerson

Supreme Court

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Dickerson

254 U.S. 609, 41 S. Ct. 60

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 8, 1920

DocketNo. 57

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 U.S. 609 (Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Dickerson, 254 U.S. 609, 41 S. Ct. 60 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. Argued October 21, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Reversed upon [610]*610authority of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Warren-Godwin Lumber Co., 251 U. S. 27; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Boegli, 251 U. S. 315. Mr. W. W. Millan, with whom Mr. James N. Flowers and Mr. Ellis B. Cooper were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. William D. Anderson, for respondent, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. Argued October 21, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Reversed upon [610]*610authority of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Warren-Godwin Lumber Co., 251 U. S. 27; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Boegli, 251 U. S. 315. Mr. W. W. Millan, with whom Mr. James N. Flowers and Mr. Ellis B. Cooper were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. William D. Anderson, for respondent, submitted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 609, 41 S. Ct. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postal-telegraph-cable-co-v-dickerson-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack