Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 6, 1913

DocketAppeal, No. 196

StatusPublished

This text of 86 A. 480 (Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh, 86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015 (Pa. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The established practice in an appeal from a decree granting or dissolving a preliminary injunction is to determine only whether, under the facts shown, the discretion of the court was rightly exercised, and to express no opinion on the merits of the case: Paxson’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 429; North Shore Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania Co., 231 Pa. 307. We see no adequate reason for reversing the decree appealed from and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The established practice in an appeal from a decree granting or dissolving a preliminary injunction is to determine only whether, under the facts shown, the discretion of the court was rightly exercised, and to express no opinion on the merits of the case: Paxson’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 429; North Shore Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania Co., 231 Pa. 307. We see no adequate reason for reversing the decree appealed from and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postal-telegraph-cable-co-v-city-of-pittsburgh-pa-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack