Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh
86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015
Opinion
The established practice in an appeal from a decree granting or dissolving a preliminary injunction is to determine only whether, under the facts shown, the discretion of the court was rightly exercised, and to express no opinion on the merits of the case: Paxson’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 429; North Shore Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania Co., 231 Pa. 307. We see no adequate reason for reversing the decree appealed from and it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh, 86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015 (Pa. 1913).
86 A. 480 (Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paxson's Appeal
106 Pa. 429 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1884)
North Shore Railroad v. Pennsylvania Co.
80 A. 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)