Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 196·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The established practice in an appeal from a decree granting or dissolving a preliminary injunction is to determine only whether, under the facts shown, the discretion of the court was rightly exercised, and to express no opinion on the merits of the case: Paxson’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 429; North Shore Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania Co., 231 Pa. 307. We see no adequate reason for reversing the decree appealed from and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh, 86 A. 480, 238 Pa. 589, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 1015 (Pa. 1913).

86 A. 480 (Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. City of Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paxson's Appeal
106 Pa. 429 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1884)
North Shore Railroad v. Pennsylvania Co.
80 A. 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)