Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bruen

39 N.Y.S. 220
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 14, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 39 N.Y.S. 220 (Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bruen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bruen, 39 N.Y.S. 220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is a motion to confirm the report of commissioners of appraisal, and the only objection to such confirmation which requires any attention has reference to the insertion, in the order appointing the commissioners, of the date for their first meeting. The commissioners, in their report, say they met on the day specified in the order, and it appeared upon the argument that the order as it was entered contained the date. My conclusion is that the object of the statute has been accomplished by the meeting of the [223]*223commissioners, and the objection has been waived by the appearance of the defendant, and by proceeding before the commissioners without raising the objection. The report must therefore be confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 N.Y.S. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postal-telegraph-cable-co-v-bruen-nysupct-1896.