Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Barnes-Fain Co.
This text of 93 S.E. 256 (Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Barnes-Fain Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. While the addressee of a telegram may sue the telegraph company in tort and recover for such damage as 'proximately results from its breach of duty to serve the public with due care (Stewart v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 131 Ga. 31, 61 S. E. 1045, 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 692, 127 Am. St. R. 205),, he can not recover for damage not caused by the negligence of the telegraph company, but which resulted from his voluntary act in complying with the terms of a proposal or contract which he was under no legal compulsion to perform. Sparks Milling Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 9 Ga. App. 728 (72 S. E. 179).
2. The evidence did not authorize the judgment of the trial court. Therefore the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 256, 20 Ga. App. 663, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postal-telegraph-cable-co-v-barnes-fain-co-gactapp-1917.