Post v. Thomas
This text of 183 A.D. 525 (Post v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The notice of appeal was duly served upon all the parties, including the attorney for the plaintiff Post. In the mean[526]*526time the attorney for the plaintiff Post has died, and no one. has been substituted as attorney in his place and stead. The plaintiff Post is and has been absent from the State of New York for several months past, serving in the Naval Reserve force of the United States. No notice of the argument of this appeal was served upon Post, who is the party most interested'in the appeal, for, as the case now stands, there will be a large bill of costs entered against the plaintiffs, for which, if Warner should be successful on this appeal, Post would be solely liable. The matter should not be determined without Post having notice of argument and an opportunity to be heard.
The Congress of the United States has passed the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act, approved March 8, 1918, which provides for the staying, in the discretion of the court in which it is pending, on its own motion, of all actions or proceedings by or against a person in the military service during the period of such service or within sixty days thereafter. (40 U. S. Stat. at Large,-, chap.-; Id.-, § 201.) The Naval Reserve force, with which Post is serving, is specifically mentioned in said act as being within the term “ military service.” (40 id.-, § 101.) Therefore, the papers on this appeal will be returned to the clerk of this court and all proceedings herein be stayed until the expiration of the military service of the plaintiff Edwin M. Post, and for sixty days thereafter, unless said Post shall sooner cause an attorney to appear herein in his behalf; in which event, notice of argument may be served on said attorney and the appeal be argued or submitted.
Clarke, P. J., Smith, Davis and Shearn, JJ., concurred.
Proceedings stayed as stated in opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 A.D. 525, 170 N.Y.S. 227, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1918.