Post v. Sarmiento
19 F. Cas. 1092, 2 Wash. C. C. 198
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 19 F. Cas. 1092 (Post v. Sarmiento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Post v. Sarmiento, 19 F. Cas. 1092, 2 Wash. C. C. 198 (circtdpa 1808).
Opinion
It is impossible to decide whether the action, said to be depending in the supreme court of this state, is for the same cause of action, and is at the suit of the plaintiff in this cause, without deciding a point, upon which probably the whole merits of the cause depend. The rule of the court is imperative, and ought to be adhered to. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Breckon v. Ottawa Circuit Judge
67 N.W. 906 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 F. Cas. 1092, 2 Wash. C. C. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-sarmiento-circtdpa-1808.