Post v. Sarmiento
19 F. Cas. 1092, 2 Wash. C. C. 198
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
It is impossible to decide whether the action, said to be depending in the supreme court of this state, is for the same cause of action, and is at the suit of the plaintiff in this cause, without deciding a point, upon which probably the whole merits of the cause depend. The rule of the court is imperative, and ought to be adhered to. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Post v. Sarmiento, 19 F. Cas. 1092, 2 Wash. C. C. 198 (circtdpa 1808).
19 F. Cas. 1092 (Post v. Sarmiento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Breckon v. Ottawa Circuit Judge
67 N.W. 906 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)