Post v. Riley

18 Johns. 54
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1820·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, although his plea of discharge, so far as it went to his absolute discharge from the debt, was overruled, ought to have pleaded it specially, in discharge of his person from arrest and imprisonment, which is the proper mode of availing himself of it. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Post v. Riley, 18 Johns. 54 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

18 Johns. 54 (Post v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudge v. Rundle
1 Thomp. & Cook 649 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Foord's Case
5 N.H. 310 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1830)
Campbell v. Palmer
6 Cow. 596 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Seaman v. Drake
1 Cai. Cas. 9 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)