Post v. . Post
104 N.E. 1134, 210 N.Y. 607, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1361
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Oardózo, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Post v. . Post, 104 N.E. 1134, 210 N.Y. 607, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1361 (N.Y. 1914).
104 N.E. 1134 (Post v. . Post) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Zietz
207 Misc. 22 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1954)
In Re the Estate of Holmes
52 N.E.2d 424 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
Guinness v. Guinness
180 Misc. 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Standish v. Standish
179 Misc. 564 (New York Family Court, 1943)
In re the Estate of Smidt
162 Misc. 596 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1937)
Richards v. Richards
132 Misc. 551 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)
Atkinson v. Atkinson
217 A.D. 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Moody v. Soper
117 Misc. 439 (New York Supreme Court, 1921)
Kaufman v. Kaufman
177 A.D. 162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Lie v. Lie
96 Misc. 3 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)