Post v. Haight
2 How. Pr. 175
This text of 2 How. Pr. 175 (Post v. Haight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Post v. Haight, 2 How. Pr. 175 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Plaintiff’s counsel insisted that the precept was irregular, it could not be issued until twenty days after the date of the order, under the 60 rule.
Held, that the precept was prematurely issued, defendant *should have waited twenty days under the 60 rule. Motion denied with costs, but no action for false imprisonment to be brought by plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-haight-nysupct-1846.