Post v. Haight
1 How. Pr. 171
This text of 1 How. Pr. 171 (Post v. Haight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Post v. Haight, 1 How. Pr. 171 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Said he could not look beyond the papers, and the records in the suit, to ascertain who the attorney was in fact, it was enough for him to know that an attorney of this court appeared upon the records and in the papers for the motion; without inquiring by what [172]*172means or in what manner he came to he the attorney, The motion must he granted.
Decision.—Motion granted with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-haight-nysupct-1845.