Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Eleventh Circuit

Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale

14 F.3d 583, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40942

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 22, 1994

Docket92-4661

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 14 F.3d 583 (Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 14 F.3d 583, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40942 (11th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

14 F.3d 583

Sandra POST, Abilio Lirio, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Defendant,
Doug Danziger, City Commissioner, John Schlegel, Boris
Sellers-Sampson, Roy Hurley, William Helms,
William Banks, Sr., Defendants-Appellants,
Patrick Roberts, Phil Krauss, Defendants.

No. 92-4661.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 22, 1994.

Robert H. Schwartz, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for defendants-appellants.

Louis C. Thomas, Herzfeld and Rubin, Miami, FL, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 89-6810-Civ-JAG), Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Before EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and HILL, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We hereby modify our earlier opinion (7 F.3d 1552) by deleting on page 1557 the third full paragraph that begins "Qualified immunity is...." and by deleting on page 1557 the fourth full paragraph that begins "The objective nature...."

The judgment of the court and the remainder of the opinion are unchanged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI