Post v. Arnott

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386

Opinion

The Court of Errors held that the action of ejectment could not be sustained; that the tender after foreclosure did not discharge the lieu, ipso facto, so as to vest the title in the purchaser at the sheriff’s sale, and that his proper remedy appeared to be by bill in equity, where equitable conditions might be imposed, and the interest of all parties protected, p. 348.

Judgment reversed, 11 to 9.