Post v. Arnott

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Post v. Arnott

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386 (Post v. Arnott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Post v. Arnott, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Errors held that the action of ejectment could not be sustained; that the tender after foreclosure did not discharge the lieu, ipso facto, so as to vest the title in the purchaser at the sheriff’s sale, and that his proper remedy appeared to be by bill in equity, where equitable conditions might be imposed, and the interest of all parties protected, p. 348.

Judgment reversed, 11 to 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Errors held that the action of ejectment could not be sustained; that the tender after foreclosure did not discharge the lieu, ipso facto, so as to vest the title in the purchaser at the sheriff’s sale, and that his proper remedy appeared to be by bill in equity, where equitable conditions might be imposed, and the interest of all parties protected, p. 348.

Judgment reversed, 11 to 9.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-arnott-nycterr-1799.