Post v. American Central Insurance
This text of 51 Pa. Super. 352 (Post v. American Central Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion bt
In refusing the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and directing judgment to be entered on the verdict, the learned judge of the common pleas filed an elaborate and convincing opinion. In it he reviews separately and fully each one of the legal points [364]*364advanced by the appellant as ground for a reversal of the judgment.
After an examination of the entire record and due consideration of the arguments of counsel, we are all of opinion the case was properly tried and the judgment should not be disturbed. To undertake to here set forth the reasons that lead us to this conclusion would be to do again what has been done by the learned trial judge. We therefore adopt his opinion. The assignments of error are overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Pa. Super. 352, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/post-v-american-central-insurance-pasuperct-1912.