Posselius v. United States

31 F. Supp. 161, 90 Ct. Cl. 519, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 396, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 117
United States Court of Claims·Decided February 5, 1940·No. No. 43980·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Littleton, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

Plaintiff contends,that the interest of $4,900.34 paid to and received by him in 1984, under the circumstances set forth in the findings, was exempt from tax under the provisions of section 22 (b) (4) (A) of the Revenue Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 680) as being interest upon an obligation of a. state, territory, or a political subdivision of the State of Michigan. For the reasons set forth in the case of the Williams Land Co. v. United States, decided this date, ante p. 499, we hold that the interest in question was taxable and was properly included in plaintiff’s gross income for 1934. Plaintiff is, therefore, not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Whitaker, Judge; Williams, Judge; Greek, Judge; and Whalet, Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Posselius v. United States, 31 F. Supp. 161, 90 Ct. Cl. 519, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 396, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 117 (cc 1940).

31 F. Supp. 161 (Posselius v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kieselbach v. Commissioner
317 U.S. 399 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Kieselbach
127 F.2d 359 (Third Circuit, 1942)
Holley v. United States
124 F.2d 909 (Sixth Circuit, 1942)