Posniak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 26, 2021
Docket16-1351
StatusUnpublished

This text of Posniak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Posniak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Posniak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Opinion

Sn the Cnited States Court of Federal Claiung

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: March 30, 2021

* Kk Ok ok Ok Ck ok Ok ok Xk Kk Ok Kk Ok Kk OK OK Kk

ROBIN POSNIAK, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 16-1351V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Decision Based on Stipulation; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Transverse Myelitis (“TM”). Respondent. * * * ok Ok ck ok ok ck ok kk ok OK Kk ok OK Kk ok OK

Robert Joel Krakow, Law Office of Robert J. Krakow, P.C., New York, NY, for petitioner. Camille Michelle Collett, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION BASED ON STIPULATION!

On October 17, 2016, Robin Posniak (“petitioner”) filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Petitioner alleged that as a result of an influenza (“flu”)

vaccine on October 16, 2013, she developed transverse myelitis (“TM”). Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1).

On March 30, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation recommending an award of compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 153). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged TM and/r any other injury or condition. Nevertheless, the parties

' Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

? The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

1 agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

(1) A lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation at { 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.*

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora B. Dorsey Nora B. Dorsey

Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ROBIN POSNIAK,

Petitioner, v. No. 16-1351V

Special Master Nora Beth Dorscy

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

IPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the folowimg matters:

1. Petitioner filed a petition for vaccme compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the influenza vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the influcnza vaccination on or about October 16, 2013.

3. The vaccine was administered within thc United States.

4, Petitioner alleges that she suffered transverse myelitis (“TM”), which was caused by the flu vaccine, Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her alleged TM for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition.

9 /0 # 0081: WdZE TL bo-72-€0 6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged TM and/or any other injury or condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties neverthcless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation,

8, As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This

amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attomeys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10, Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identificd to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq,)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis,

9 /& # 0081: WdZ€ +715 b2-70-€0 11, Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation, and any amount awarded pursuant to paragraph 9, will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds,

12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Posniak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posniak-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2021.