Positive Software v. New Century Mortgage

476 F.3d 278
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Positive Software v. New Century Mortgage. Read the opinion of the Court — 476 F.3d 278
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2006·No. 04-11432·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D R E V I S E D 05/15/06 May 5, 2006 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Clerk

No. 04-11432

POSITIVE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.

Plaintiff-Appellee v.

NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION; NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION; eCONDUIT CORPORATION; THE ANYLOAN COMPANY; JEFF LEMIEUX; FRANK NESE

Defendants-Appellants

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas - - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion January 11, 2006, 5 Cir., 2006, _____F.3d____)

BEFORE: JONES, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.1

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

1 Judge King did not participate in the decision. court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Positive Software v. New Century Mortgage, 476 F.3d 278 (5th Cir. 2006).

476 F.3d 278 (Positive Software v. New Century Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.