Posey v. Roberts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Posey v. Roberts

221 So. 3d 787, 2017 WL 2871022, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9665

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D17-1554·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of quo warranto is denied on the merits. Petitioner is warned [788]*788that the filing of any other pleadings deemed by the court to be meritless may result in sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on pro se filings and a referral to the Department of Corrections for disciplinary action under section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of quo warranto is denied on the merits. Petitioner is warned [788]*788that the filing of any other pleadings deemed by the court to be meritless may result in sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on pro se filings and a referral to the Department of Corrections for disciplinary action under section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Posey v. Roberts, 221 So. 3d 787, 2017 WL 2871022, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

221 So. 3d 787 (Posey v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related