Posey v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Tayvion Posey, 2:23-cv-01936-GMN-MDC 4 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 5 vs. 6 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 7 Defendant(s). 8 This matter has been referred for a settlement conference. To help facilitate the scheduling of the 9 settlement conference, a court conference is set for March 3, 2025, at 9:00am to discuss scheduling and 10 other related matters. 11 The scheduling conference will be held via video conference. The parties/counsel must email 12 Courtroom Administrator, Tawnee Renfro at Tawnee_Renfro@nvd.uscourts.gov, with an email address 13 to be used for the video conference hearing by noon, April 28, 2025. 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE VIDEO CONFERENCE: 2 Instructions to the scheduled hearings will be sent via email thirty (30) minutes prior to the 3 || hearing to the participants email provided to the Court. 4 e Log on to the call ten (10) minutes prior to the hearing time. 5 e Mute your sound prior to entering the hearing. 6 e Do not talk over one another. 7 e State your name prior to speaking for the record. 8 e Do not have others in the video screen or moving in the background. 9 e No recording of the hearing. 10 e No forwarding of any video conference invitations. 11 e Unauthorized users on the video conference will be removed. 12 8 DATED this 21* day of February 2025. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. J “pp Do . OK) 16 f-—__[f | —___ Hon. Soe Dz Couvillier I] 17 United States Magistrate Judge 18 NOTICE 19 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 20 || recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 21 || of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 22 || may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 23 || time. Thomas vy. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). 24 This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) 25 || failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District

1 Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 2 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 3 Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any 4 change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, 5 or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may 6 result in dismissal of the action.

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25