Posey v. Indiana

Supreme Court

Posey v. Indiana

317 U.S. 682, 63 S. Ct. 200

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 16, 1942

DocketNo. 445

StatusPublished

This text of 317 U.S. 682 (Posey v. Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Posey v. Indiana, 317 U.S. 682, 63 S. Ct. 200 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Criminal Court, Lake County, Indiana is denied for the reason that it does not appear from the papers submitted that petitioner has exhausted state remedies by appealing to the highest court of the state the judgment sought to be reviewed. Under the law of Indiana the permission of the trial court to appeal as a poor person, which petitioner alleges was refused, does not appear to be necessary in order to take an effective appeal (see State ex rel. Rankin v. Worden, 40 N. E. 2d 970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Criminal Court, Lake County, Indiana is denied for the reason that it does not appear from the papers submitted that petitioner has exhausted state remedies by appealing to the highest court of the state the judgment sought to be reviewed. Under the law of Indiana the permission of the trial court to appeal as a poor person, which petitioner alleges was refused, does not appear to be necessary in order to take an effective appeal (see State ex rel. Rankin v. Worden, 40 N. E. 2d 970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 U.S. 682, 63 S. Ct. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posey-v-indiana-scotus-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack