Posey v. Hair

12 Ala. 567
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 12 Ala. 567 (Posey v. Hair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Posey v. Hair, 12 Ala. 567 (Ala. 1847).

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

The certainty which is required in a declaration, or plea, is such a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, or ground of defence, as will enable them to be understood by the party who is to answer them, the jury who are to ascertain their truth, and by the court which is to give the judgment. [Chit. PI. 212.] Nor will the introduction of the words certain debt, or certain-sum, be of any avail, if the debt or sum is not otherwise sufficiently stated. [Ib. 216.] The counts overruled are clearly deficient in this kind of certainty, and therefore the demurrer was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Industrial Sav. Bank v. Greenwald
158 So. 734 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Jones v. Keith
134 So. 630 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Jefferson County v. Gulf Refining Co.
80 So. 798 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Weller & Co. v. Camp
52 So. 929 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ala. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posey-v-hair-ala-1847.