Posella v. Posella

California Court of Appeal

Posella v. Posella

265 P.2d 967, 123 Cal. App. 2d 30, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1137

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Posella v. Posella. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Cal. App. 2d 456 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided February 3, 1954·No. Civ. No. 19565·Published

Opinion

DRAPEAU, J.

December 8,1953, this court made its order staying execution and enforcement of the superior court judgment in this case. This was done upon the representation of the defendant that she had been denied due process of law and that she was perfecting proceedings for review of the case by certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States.

This case was decided in this court September 29, 1953 (120 Cal.App.2d 456 [261 P.2d 37]), remittitur issued November 30, 1953.

Plaintiff now moves to vacate and set aside the order.

The motion was submitted so that we might go over the record, in view of defendant’s assertion of denial of due process.

From a review of the record it appears that all of the proceedings were regular and that there is no good ground for recalling the remittitur or continuing the stay of execution (In re McGee, 37 Cal.2d 6 [229 P.2d 780]).

The motion is granted. The order is vacated and set aside.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DRAPEAU, J.

December 8,1953, this court made its order staying execution and enforcement of the superior court judgment in this case. This was done upon the representation of the defendant that she had been denied due process of law and that she was perfecting proceedings for review of the case by certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States.

This case was decided in this court September 29, 1953 (120 Cal.App.2d 456 [261 P.2d 37]), remittitur issued November 30, 1953.

Plaintiff now moves to vacate and set aside the order.

The motion was submitted so that we might go over the record, in view of defendant’s assertion of denial of due process.

From a review of the record it appears that all of the proceedings were regular and that there is no good ground for recalling the remittitur or continuing the stay of execution (In re McGee, 37 Cal.2d 6 [229 P.2d 780]).

The motion is granted. The order is vacated and set aside.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Posella v. Posella, 265 P.2d 967, 123 Cal. App. 2d 30, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1137 (Cal. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

265 P.2d 967 (Posella v. Posella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related