Posan v. Boyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Posan v. Boyer

DecidedMay 27, 2026

Docket2025-0491

StatusPublished

This text of Posan v. Boyer (Posan v. Boyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Posan v. Boyer, (Ohio 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Posan v. Boyer, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1898.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2026-OHIO-1898 POSAN, APPELLEE, v. BOYER ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Posan v. Boyer, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1898.] Cause remanded to court of appeals for application of Hoskins v. Cleveland. (No. 2025-0491―Submitted May 19, 2026―Decided May 27, 2026.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 31116, 2025-Ohio-529. __________________ The below judgment of the court was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DETERS, HAWKINS, and SHANAHAN, JJ. BRUNNER, J., concurred in part and dissented in part and would dismiss the cause as having been improvidently accepted as to both propositions of law. _________________ {¶ 1} Sua sponte, as to proposition of law No. I, the judgment of the Ninth District Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for application of our decision in Hoskins v. Cleveland, 2026-Ohio-1225. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

{¶ 2} As to proposition of law No. II, the cause is sua sponte dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. __________________ Stark & Knoll and Orville L. Reed III, for appellee, Amanda Posan. Hanna, Campbell & Powell, L.L.P., and Kenneth A. Calderone, James M. Lyons Jr., and John R. Chlysta, for appellants, William J. Boyer, Barberton Board of Education, and Barberton High School. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Posan v. Boyer, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1898.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2026-OHIO-1898 POSAN, APPELLEE, v. BOYER ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Posan v. Boyer, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1898.] Cause remanded to court of appeals for application of Hoskins v. Cleveland. (No. 2025-0491―Submitted May 19, 2026―Decided May 27, 2026.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 31116, 2025-Ohio-529. __________________ The below judgment of the court was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DETERS, HAWKINS, and SHANAHAN, JJ. BRUNNER, J., concurred in part and dissented in part and would dismiss the cause as having been improvidently accepted as to both propositions of law. _________________ {¶ 1} Sua sponte, as to proposition of law No. I, the judgment of the Ninth District Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for application of our decision in Hoskins v. Cleveland, 2026-Ohio-1225. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

{¶ 2} As to proposition of law No. II, the cause is sua sponte dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. __________________ Stark & Knoll and Orville L. Reed III, for appellee, Amanda Posan. Hanna, Campbell & Powell, L.L.P., and Kenneth A. Calderone, James M. Lyons Jr., and John R. Chlysta, for appellants, William J. Boyer, Barberton Board of Education, and Barberton High School. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Posan v. Boyer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/posan-v-boyer-ohio-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack