Posada v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
YAMIRA POSADA,
Plaintiff,
v. No. 1:21-cv-0972 MIS-JHR
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND AND AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER’S DISABILITY DECISION.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Yamira Posada’s Motion to Reverse or Remand [Doc. 24]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Virginia Beach Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct all warranted hearings, perform necessary legal analysis, and recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. See [Doc. 28]. Judge Ritter entered his Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on August 28, 2023, in which he analyzed the matters briefed by the parties and recommended that the Court deny Posada’s motion. [Doc. 29]. Pursuant to § 636(b)(1), the parties were given fourteen days to object to Judge Ritter’s proposed findings, analysis, and recommended disposition. See [Doc. 29]. The deadline for objections has passed and neither party objected. The Court has performed a de novo review of Judge Ritter’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and finds no error in them. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ritter’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 29] are ADOPTED by the Court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse or Remand [Doc. 24] is DENIED and the Commissioner’s Final Decision is AFFIRMED.
MARGARET STRICKLAND U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Posada v. Social Security Administration (Posada v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.