Portuda v. Shepherd

123 F. App'x 454
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 2005
DocketNo. 03-0148
StatusPublished

This text of 123 F. App'x 454 (Portuda v. Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Portuda v. Shepherd, 123 F. App'x 454 (2d Cir. 2005).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment be AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-appellant Eon Shepherd, pro se, appeals from a judgment entered on March 25, 2003 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Kahn, /.), adopting Magistrate Judge DiBianco’s decision granting defendant-appellees’ motions for summary judgment as to Shepherd’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he claimed denial of access to the courts. We assume familiarity with the facts, the procedural context, and the issues on appeal.

For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F. App'x 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portuda-v-shepherd-ca2-2005.