Portu v. City of Coral Gables, Johns E. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Portu v. City of Coral Gables, Johns E. Co.

239 So. 3d 1295

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 2018

DocketNo. 1D16–4767

StatusPublished

This text of 239 So. 3d 1295 (Portu v. City of Coral Gables, Johns E. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Portu v. City of Coral Gables, Johns E. Co., 239 So. 3d 1295 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Peter Portu appeals the workers' compensation order denying attorney's fees and costs. We reverse as to attorney's fees. We affirm as to costs because Portu did not preserve his claim for appeal.

Section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes (2009), entitles a claimant to attorney's fees when the "carrier files a response to petition denying benefits"; the claimant has a "successful prosecution of the petition"; and thirty days elapse from "the date the carrier ... receives the petition." Franco v. SCI at Palmer Club at Prestancia , 989 So.2d 709, 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (quoting statute). Each of those factors is present here. The fact that the petition sought a higher impairment rating than the employer eventually agreed to does not change the statutory factors. On remand, the judge of compensation claims must award fees.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

Kelsey, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Peter Portu appeals the workers' compensation order denying attorney's fees and costs. We reverse as to attorney's fees. We affirm as to costs because Portu did not preserve his claim for appeal.

Section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes (2009), entitles a claimant to attorney's fees when the "carrier files a response to petition denying benefits"; the claimant has a "successful prosecution of the petition"; and thirty days elapse from "the date the carrier ... receives the petition." Franco v. SCI at Palmer Club at Prestancia , 989 So.2d 709, 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (quoting statute). Each of those factors is present here. The fact that the petition sought a higher impairment rating than the employer eventually agreed to does not change the statutory factors. On remand, the judge of compensation claims must award fees.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

Kelsey, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 So. 3d 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portu-v-city-of-coral-gables-johns-e-co-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack