Porto Rico v. Tapia

245 U.S. 639, 38 S. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 525, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1648
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 21, 1918·No. No. 534·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed upon the authority of Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244; Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197; Dorr v. United States, 195 U. S. 138; Rassmussen v. United States, 197 U. S. 516; Kopel v. Bingham, 211 U. S. 468; Dowdell v. United States, 221 U. S. 91; Porto Rico v. Rosaly, 227 U. S. 270, 274; Ocampo v. United States, 234 U. S. 91, 98.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porto Rico v. Tapia, 245 U.S. 639, 38 S. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 525, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1648 (1918).

245 U.S. 639 (Porto Rico v. Tapia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamson v. Alldridge
320 F. Supp. 840 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1970)
Porto Rico Brokerage Co. v. United States
71 F.2d 469 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1934)
United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. District Court of Humacao
44 P.R. 904 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. Corte de Distrito de Humacao
44 P.R. Dec. 930 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Lastra v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co.
2 F.2d 812 (First Circuit, 1924)
New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. Benedicto
12 P.R. Fed. 262 (D. Puerto Rico, 1921)
Pueblo v. Balzac
28 P.R. Dec. 150 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Hernández de Ramery v. People
26 P.R. 661 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1918)
de Ramery v. Pueblo
26 P.R. Dec. 726 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1918)