Porto Rico v. Tapia

245 U.S. 639, 38 S. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 525, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1648
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 21, 1918
DocketNo. 534
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 245 U.S. 639 (Porto Rico v. Tapia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porto Rico v. Tapia, 245 U.S. 639, 38 S. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 525, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1648 (1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed upon the authority of Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244; Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197; Dorr v. United States, 195 U. S. 138; Rassmussen v. United States, 197 U. S. 516; Kopel v. Bingham, 211 U. S. 468; Dowdell v. United States, 221 U. S. 91; Porto Rico v. Rosaly, 227 U. S. 270, 274; Ocampo v. United States, 234 U. S. 91, 98.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williamson v. Alldridge
320 F. Supp. 840 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1970)
Porto Rico Brokerage Co. v. United States
71 F.2d 469 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1934)
United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. District Court of Humacao
44 P.R. 904 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. Corte de Distrito de Humacao
44 P.R. Dec. 930 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Lastra v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co.
2 F.2d 812 (First Circuit, 1924)
New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. Benedicto
12 P.R. Fed. 262 (D. Puerto Rico, 1921)
Pueblo v. Balzac
28 P.R. Dec. 150 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Hernández de Ramery v. People
26 P.R. 661 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1918)
de Ramery v. Pueblo
26 P.R. Dec. 726 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 U.S. 639, 38 S. Ct. 192, 62 L. Ed. 525, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porto-rico-v-tapia-scotus-1918.