Porto Rico Fertilizer Co. v. Gandía

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Porto Rico Fertilizer Co. v. Gandía

32 P.R. 884

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porto Rico Fertilizer Co. v. Gandía. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 P.R. Dec. 386 →

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided March 28, 1924·No. No. 3012·Published

Opinion

Complaint having been filed for the fulfilment of an obligation and praying that the defendant refund a certain sum alleged to have been unduly received, and the petition for attachment being in accordance with the Act to secure the effectiveness of judgments, which, as amended in 1916, does not require as formerly the averment in the petition of the facts and legal grounds, the order appealed from was affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Complaint having been filed for the fulfilment of an obligation and praying that the defendant refund a certain sum alleged to have been unduly received, and the petition for attachment being in accordance with the Act to secure the effectiveness of judgments, which, as amended in 1916, does not require as formerly the averment in the petition of the facts and legal grounds, the order appealed from was affirmed.

Porto Rico Fertilizer Co. v. Gandía, 32 P.R. 884 (prsupreme 1924).

Pincite

32 P.R. 884 (Porto Rico Fertilizer Co. v. Gandía) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.