Portnow v. La Rosa

190 Misc. 695, 78 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2280
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 14, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The petition is defective inasmuch as it describes the petitioner as the owner in fee of the premises when admittedly he is a co-owner. Section 1415 of the Civil Practice Act requires that he and his co-owner should join in the petition and state their interests in the premises. (Lucchesi v. Johnson, N. Y. L. J., Dec. 14, 1946, p. 1749, col. 6.)

[696]*696The final order should be unanimously modified on the law by inserting a provision that the dismissal of the proceeding was without prejudice, and, as so modified, the final order should be affirmed, without costs.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Portnow v. La Rosa, 190 Misc. 695, 78 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

190 Misc. 695 (Portnow v. La Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Panzica v. Cimino
21 Misc. 2d 1076 (New York County Courts, 1959)