Portman v. Housel

226 P. 1117, 75 Colo. 506, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 435
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJune 2, 1924
DocketNo. 10,867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 P. 1117 (Portman v. Housel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Portman v. Housel, 226 P. 1117, 75 Colo. 506, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 435 (Colo. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the record satisfies us that the judgment is wrong. Pending the application for a supersedeas [507]*507a showing has been made here that the cause is now moot. Hence no opinion is necessary.

The application for supersedeas is denied. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, with instructions to the district court to dismiss the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beeson v. Kiowa County School Dist. Re-1
567 P.2d 801 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 P. 1117, 75 Colo. 506, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portman-v-housel-colo-1924.