Portman v. Burack
This text of 265 A.D. 959 (Portman v. Burack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint does not contain facts sufficient to show that, if defendants had not interfered, plaintiff would have earned a commission. (Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier, 263 N. Y. 386, 401.) The words “that the plaintiff’s negotiations proceeded to a point where a contract of sale would probably have resulted, except for the conduct of the defendants, hereinafter described” are not sufficient even if the word “ probably ” had been omitted. They are merely a statement of a conclusion. If facts were stated showing that negotiations between plaintiff and defendants had reached a stage as a result of which plaintiff would have earned a commission if it were not for the alleged deceit of defendants, a cause of action would have been stated. (Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier, supra; Skene v. Carayanis, 103 Conn. 708.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 959, 38 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portman-v-burack-nyappdiv-1942.