Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver

97 F. Supp. 892, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2981
CourtDistrict Court, D. Oregon
DecidedApril 29, 1946
DocketCiv. 1914; No. 1013
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 F. Supp. 892 (Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver, 97 F. Supp. 892, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2981 (D. Or. 1946).

Opinion

JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.

In this case, two issues of a jurisdictional nature are placed for determination by the Court by the preliminary pretrial order drafted under the supervision of the Court. There are two main issues:

1. It is contended that this action should be dismissed because the Secretary of the Interior is an indispensable party and has not been joined.

The Court finds that the Secretary of the Interior is not an indispensable party to the maintenance of this action.

2. It is contended that the complaint should be dismissed because this is a suit against the United States.

The Court finds that the action is one against an official of the United States Government and is not in any respect an action against the United States nor does it require a judgment declaratory against the United States.

It should be noted that jurisdictional issues are always present with a court until final determination. This Court cannot now and therefore does not attempt finally to dispose of the two jurisdictional issues above noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Portland Electric Power Co.
97 F. Supp. 857 (D. Oregon, 1951)
Delzell v. Raver
97 F. Supp. 893 (D. Oregon, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. Supp. 892, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portland-general-electric-co-v-raver-ord-1946.