Portland-Columbia Lumber Co. v. Feak

186 F.2d 358
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1951
Docket12521_1
StatusPublished

This text of 186 F.2d 358 (Portland-Columbia Lumber Co. v. Feak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Portland-Columbia Lumber Co. v. Feak, 186 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that as a matter of law the jury could not find that t)he ap-pellee was diligent and timely in the conduct of the resale of the lumber and that there was no evidence that appellee’s alleged resales were timely or were made in good faith, by way of reducing the appellant’s damages for breach of contract. The line between questions of fact and of law is frequently narrow but in the instant case the acts done by the appellee to reduce the appellant’s damages were sufficient and were clearly demonstrated by the evidence. The trial judge committed no error in sending the case to the jury. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 F.2d 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portland-columbia-lumber-co-v-feak-ca9-1951.